|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 235-240
Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Emine Elif Ozkan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta 32260, Turkey
|Date of Submission||16-May-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||08-Jan-2018|
Dr. Emine Elif Ozkan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Suleyman Demirel University, Suleyman Demirel Street, Cunur, Isparta 32260
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, which frequently cause intraabdominal metastases. The current standard of care is surgery for localized cases, and adjuvant imatinib is recommended for tumors with a high risk of recurrence. To date, radiotherapy has not been commonly accepted as a part of multimodality treatment approach other than palliation. However, recently published case reports and some small series suggest that radiotherapy is a valuable option for controlling locally progressive, drug-resistant disease. The aim of this review is to provide a viewpoint from a radiation oncologist concerning the management of GISTs, especially rectal GIST, and clarify the role and technical aspects of radiotherapy in the treatment approach.
Data Sources: A comprehensive search in PubMed using the keywords “radiotherapy for rectal GIST” and “rectal GIST” was undertaken. The literature search included the related articles after 1995.
Study Selection: The main articles including rectal GIST case reports and GIST series containing rectal cases were the primary references.
Results: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. However, to date, radiotherapy is included in the multidisciplinary treatment strategy of rectal GISTs in some circumstances with palliative, adjuvant, or definitive intent using different treatment doses and fields.
Conclusions: Recently reported long-term local control rates indicate that GIST is a radiosensitive disease. This makes radiotherapy a valuable alternative in GIST management with curative intent, especially in patients who (1) cannot tolerate or are resistant to chemotherapy agents, (2) have an unresectable disease, (3) have a gross or microscopic residual disease after surgery, and (4) have a recurrent disease.
Keywords: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor; Radiotherapy; Rectum
|How to cite this article:|
Ozkan EE. Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Chin Med J 2018;131:235-40
| Introduction|| |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They are identified as a different entity from other sarcomas, arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their precursors., Size and mitotic activity is reported to be the most important factors for the risk estimation in terms of the malignant behavior of GIST according to the National Cancer Institute consensus classification.,, Location is added as a prognostic factor, and in more recent classification systems,, GIST at different locations in the gastrointestinal system necessitates different therapeutic approaches. Surgery with the R0 resection of tumor is recommended as primary treatment in nonmetastatic cases., Most of the GIST cases carry KIT gene mutations, resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation via the constitutive activation of KIT kinase activity. Therefore, imatinib, an inhibitor of KIT that is a platelet-derived growth factor-α (PDGFR-α), came into use as the standard first-line agent for metastatic GIST , and sunitinib is used for patients who are imatinib refractory. Radiotherapy is not recommended as a treatment modality in the current treatment guidelines  and is only used with palliative intent for bone metastases. This approach is based on previous reports that suggest that radiotherapy is not beneficial in the treatment of GIST  while it is considered a radiotherapy-resistant or minimally responsive entity.,,, However, the results from a few case reports  and some retrospective data  reported that GIST is not uniformly radioresistant and may benefit from radiotherapy.
Approximately 5% of all GIST cases arise in the rectum,,, and it has been reported that rectal GIST had higher rates of metastatic potential before imatinib was introduced to clinical practice., Sphincter preservation is another important part of rectal GIST treatment;,,, however, the lack of date in the literature makes rectal GIST a challenging entity. Treatment with adjuvant imatinib lowers the risk of relapse.,, Neoadjuvant administration with the intent of reducing the tumor volume improved rates of R0 resections, and even in small retrospective series, improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) has been determined and compared to upfront surgery., When the metastatic potential was evaluated with a site-related intent, more than 50% distant relapse was reported in rectal GIST patients if the number of mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPFs) was more than 5 or the tumor size was more than 5 cm. However, all the data mentioned above belonged to the preimatinib era.
This review aimed to take a closer look at the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of GIST, especially rectal GIST, and elaborate on radiation therapy in terms of indications, dose, fractionation, and treatment fields.
| Prognostic Factors|| |
Size and mitotic activity are the most frequently reported factors used to estimate the risk of malignant behavior of GIST and are confirmed by the National Cancer Institute consensus classification.,,
Miettinen and Lasota found distant metastasis in more than 50% of patients with rectal GIST who had more than 5 mitoses per 50 HPF or with tumor size larger than 5 cm, whereas other studies reported that on the contrary, tumor size could not be considered as a prognostic factor for rectal GIST.
In certain reports, rectal GIST is classified into two risk groups where low-risk group refers to tumors smaller than 5 cm and exhibiting fewer than 5 mitoses per 50 HPF and the high-risk group includes patients with tumors of 5 cm and more or exhibiting more than 5 mitoses per 50 HPF or both., Hohenberger and Eisenberg additionally concluded that low-risk GIST may not benefit from adjuvant treatment if resected with clear margins; however, for high-risk lesions, adjuvant therapy must be considered.
A third prognostic factor in more recent classification systems is considered as the location of GIST., According to the clinical data presented by Wang et al., the relapse-free survival (RFS) time of small rectal GISTs was significantly different than that in other anatomic sites. The authors demonstrated that there was an increased degree of malignancy and recurrence rate in rectal GISTs. DeMatteo et al. also reported a poorer outcome of colorectal GIST compared to nonrectal counterparts.
The approval of imatinib dramatically changed the treatment options and prognosis for GIST. Henceforth, insufficient adjuvant imatinib is also considered as a factor independently associated with poor prognosis in addition to a high mitotic count, rectal location, large size, and rupture.,, Complete resection is warranted for local disease control. Perioperative imatinib was associated with improved outcome in terms of DFS and OS (P< 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively), which might be attributed to improved surgical margins with preoperative imatinib.
In a surgical series of 21 patients with rectal GIST, mitosis, a positive resection margin and open surgery, was reported as a poor prognostic factor supported with lower DFS of the open surgery group compared with the local excision group.
Most GIST cases (85–90%) have KIT gene mutations, which result in uncontrolled cell proliferation via KIT kinase activity. A smaller proportion (5–8%) carry mutations in PDGFR-α.,,,
| General Treatment Considerations|| |
Surgical resection is considered as the standard of care for nonmetastasized GIST. Current guidelines recommend wide resection with negative margins., Most rectal GISTs were suitable for local excision ,, and some of primary GIST patients were cured by surgery alone., Local removal may be performed by transanal, transsacral (Kraske), or transvaginal approach.,, Liu et al. suggested that transanal resection is adequate for rectal GISTs located closer than 5 cm to the anus. Unlike rectal cancer, the surgical principles for rectal GISTs do not comprise lymph node dissection or total mesorectal excision; however, the complete removal of the tumor-bearing rectal wall and a tumor-covering tissue layer must be achieved when GIST originates from the muscularis propria and a negative surgical margin and complete resection are warranted.,, DeMatteo et al. reported a higher rate of local recurrence in cases with positive margins and they recommended re-excision when feasible., However, surgical indications and timing of surgery for GISTs with a diameter of <2 cm are still controversial.
Peritoneal metastases in GIST can be seen due to intraoperative tumor cell contamination and a higher risk can occur after transabdominal resection, which destroys the integrity of the peritoneum. Therefore, some authors highlight the importance of presurgical biopsy, histological evaluation, and staging. They rationalize this suggestion based on the extraluminal growth of most rectal GISTs not being clearly revealed by endoscopic inspection. Thus, cross-sectional imaging is mandatory., Pretreatment biopsy, detailed local staging, and c-kit mutation analysis are also important determinants for treatment planning in terms of surgical or adjuvant therapy.
Imatinib mesylate is the primary treatment at the onset of the disease in patients with recurrent, metastatic, or unresectable GISTs.,, Long-term imatinib may be administered until progression in unresectable patients. Cytoreductive surgery alone for recurrent, metastatic, or unresectable GISTs is not recommended.,, Adjuvant imatinib mesylate is now recommended when there is a significant risk of recurrence.,
Neoadjuvant imatinib in rectal GIST has been shown to improve the rates of complete resection as well as local DFS and OS., Wang et al.also reported this novel agent as a safe and effective neoadjuvant therapy for rectal GISTs with a higher rate of local excision and function preservation. Patients with a complete/partial response or a stable disease based on the Choi criteria after preoperative imatinib may be candidates for surgery.,, Neoadjuvant imatinib was also a suitable alternative for patients who needed multivisceral resection for a complete resection or smaller tumors at critical sites (e.g., supraanal localization with sphincter involvement). If a sufficient tumor shrinkage is achieved after neoadjuvant treatment, even laparoscopic surgery may be an option. Some authors also advocated preoperative treatment with imatinib and subsequent surgery in metastatic GIST.,,
The optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy for sphincter preservation is still a controversial issue. One of the strongest challenging topics is secondary mutations and the predisposition toward disease progression with extended periods of neoadjuvant imatinib.
| Radiotherapy Indications|| |
Previously, radiotherapy was not considered as a suitable option for GISTs due to the requirement of large abdominal fields causing small bowel toxicity and resulting in a low therapeutic ratio. However, to date, radiotherapy is included in the multidisciplinary treatment strategy of GISTs in certain circumstances. As adjuvant to surgery, radiotherapy could potentially limit the development of resistance to imatinib. Preoperative administration with or without imatinib is another indication for tumors at high risk of local recurrence or R1 resection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy helps achieve an increased rate of normal tissue sparing and safer dose escalation. Radiotherapy can also be used as a local treatment for tumors that develop in duodenal or esophageal locations where resection could cause functional problems. In locally progressive or metastatic GISTs, even short courses of radiotherapy are shown to be effective for the palliation of local symptoms with reasonable toxicity.,,,
In general, conventional fractionation and modest cumulative doses are recommended in radiation planning for GISTs, but other fractionation schemes have also been investigated depending on treatment objective. Cuaron et al. reported that patients were most commonly treated after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure. In their study, radiation therapy was delivered with 300 cGy × 10, 180 cGy × 25, and 200 cGy × 25 fractions in the patients treated conventionally. Stereotactic body radiation therapy was used for 9 tumors (2400 cGy × 1, n = 2; 900 cGy × 3, n = 2; 800 cGy × 3, n = 1; 600 cGy × 5, n = 2; and 500 cGy × 5, n = 2). Conventional-opposed photon fields were used in 59.1% of patients, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was used for nine tumors (40.9%) in the abdomen, pelvis, and paraspinal region. The partial radiographic response and the 6-month local progression-free survival were found to be 35% and 57%, respectively. The radiographic response of the patients treated with 5 Gy fraction dose was 63%, and the authors concluded that GISTs are more sensitive to a higher fraction dose.
A small series of nine patients with incompletely resection of GIST reported local control in six patients treated with 45–60 Gy of radiation. Radiotherapy, combined with imatinib, resulted in a reduction in tumor size of a large rectal GIST and allowed sphincter-sparing surgery with a dose of 50.4 Gy, which was considered adequate for a pathologic complete response.
In a case with a recurrent stomach GIST, a dose of 35 Gy was administered in 14 fractions. An objective response in the paracaval mass and pain relief was achieved without any complications. Another case was reported in which the patient underwent 50.4 Gy postoperative radiation following a R1 resection of a 7-cm rectal GIST. Two years later, the patient had remained free of disease. Knowlton et al. presented a case study in which 20 years of local control was reported in a 37-year-old man with an unresectable and nonmetastatic GIST treated with debulking surgery and 36 Gy radiotherapy. A few case studies advocated concurrent radiotherapy and TKIs. The radiation treatment of 50 Gy to metastatic site with sorafenib resulted in a clinical and radiographic response. Similarly, a large incompletely resected pelvic mass had a complete response followed by durable local control with concurrent radiation and imatinib despite the progression of liver metastasis. These similar results on local control and progression in metastasis gave rise to the suggestion that radiation helped eradicate resistant clones. Selective internal radiotherapy with 90Y microspheres has been advocated in anecdotal cases. In conclusion, GIST metastases are moderately radiosensitive and the response is durable with radiotherapy.
In the previously published cases or small series, no detail about radiotherapy fields is encountered. The treatment of GIST was reported to be challenging using abdominal fields since this caused toxicities in small bowel and visceral structures. In the current era of technological development of IMRT and image-guided radiotherapy, the treatment of abdominal diseases results in lower acute and delayed toxicity with more normal tissue protection allowing dose escalation.
In a case of GIST of the antrum following a small intestine excisional biopsy of a mass in the antrum, radiotherapy was administered to the area of disease, including most of the stomach with a 1.5 cm margin to 36 Gy in 24 fractions of 1.5 Gy each with anteroposterior/posteroanterior fields. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with no late toxicity. Cuaron et al. used conventional-opposed photon fields in 59.1% of patients and IMRT was used for nine tumors (40.9%) in the abdomen, pelvis, and paraspinal region.
The total treatment plan, treatment field, and position used in rectal GIST radiotherapy were reported in detail by Pollock et al. in a case that was treated in a frog-legged position to protect tissues at risk. Rectal contrast and an anal marker were used for accurate determination. The first 36 Gy was delivered to the whole pelvis from the lumbosacral junction as the superior border to 4 cm inferior to the anal verge. The second phase of the treatment was 9 Gy to a partial pelvic field with the superior border shrinking to the base of the sacroiliac joints. Anteroposterior-opposed field arrangement was used with customized blocking. The pelvic and perirectal lymph nodes were included where lateral inguinal lymph nodes were excluded while no evidence of involvement was detected in a physical examination or computed tomography (CT) scan, which suggested that there was a low risk of occult disease. A final phase of 540 cGy was delivered to the volume determined by a contrast study. The margins were 2 cm on the CT-based tumor volume.
The two main metastatic routes of GIST are through intraperitoneal dissemination and the liver; however, metastasis to other visceral organs is rare. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in GIST patients is a very important determinant for field design. Although a number of cases have been reported, lymph node metastasis is also unusual (1–2%);,,,,,, therefore, routine lymphadenectomy is not recommended.,,,
In a series of 29 patients with GIST, lymph node metastasis was investigated retrospectively in positron emission tomography-CT database with the finding that the incidence was 20.7%. Other than stomach or small bowel, 4 of the 5 adult metastatic patients had a primary tumor at very rare sites and this was statistically significant (P = 0.004). The incidence of lymph node metastasis in gastric GISTs was also very low; however, the actual incidence is still a matter of debate due to the limited number of lymph node dissection. In 57 patients who underwent R0 resection, lymph node metastasis was reported as 8.8%. The published case reports ,,,,,, and series ,,,,,,,, are summarized in [Supplementary Table 1] [Additional file 1] and [Supplementary Table 2] [Additional file 2], respectively, in terms of management modalities used, details of the surgical procedure, radiotherapy treatment doses and fields, and outcomes if available. Taking the literature into consideration, although there is no accepted guideline, elective lymph node irradiation can be omitted in rectal GIST cases.
Radiotherapy is usually well tolerated; however, imatinib enhances sensitivity to radiotherapy. In a report by Yuasa et al., diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue were recorded in 13 (52%), 9 (36%), and 8 (32%) patients, respectively during or after radiotherapy. Anemia was frequently recorded but attributed to advanced GIST and TKI therapy rather than radiotherapy. TKIs that inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors may cause recall reactions  to radiotherapy and bleeding  at the irradiated sites. On the contrary, a few Phase I and II trials suggested that concomitant sunitinib and radiotherapy is safe., In a recent Phase II study with sorafenib both concomitantly and after radiotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, 35% of the 40 patients treated developed >2 grade hepatotoxicity and 15% had >3 grade hepatotoxicity. Radiotherapy appears to be well tolerated in patients who have GIST progressing at one or a few sites treated with palliate intent. Before the imatinib mesylate era, 29 cases of rectal GIST (KIT-positive) had been reported for the treatment of GISTs in Japan. None of them was treated with radiotherapy.
| Conclusions|| |
Conclusively, radiotherapy has not been preferred as one of the modalities in the general management of GIST. This limited use can be attributed to the pattern of metastasis in GIST and radiotherapy has been restricted for palliative intent in previous reports., Recently reported long-term local control indicates that GIST is radiosensitive, which is contrary to common belief. This might make radiotherapy a valuable alternative in GIST management with curative intent, especially in patients who (1) cannot tolerate or are resistant to TKI agents, (2) have an unresectable disease, (3) have a gross or microscopic residual disease after surgery, or (4) have a recurrent disease.
Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Chinese Medical Journal website.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii21-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu255.
Casali PG, Blay JY; ESMO/CONTICANET/EUROBONET Consensus Panel of Experts. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010;21 Suppl 5:v98-102. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq208.
Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, et al.
NCCN Task Force report: Update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8 Suppl 2:S1-41.
Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, et al.
Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459-65. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545.
DeMatteo RP, Gold JS, Saran L, Gönen M, Liau KH, Maki RG, et al.
Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer 2008;112:608-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23199.
Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol 2006;23:70-83. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2006.09.001.
Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, et al.
Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:1329-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4.
Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, Yeap BY, Souba WW, Ott MJ. The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136:383-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.383.
von Mehren M. Imatinib-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The clinical problem and therapeutic strategies. Curr Oncol Rep 2006;8:192-7. doi: 10.1007/s11912-006-0019-3.
Sawaki A, Yamao K. Imatinib mesylate acts in metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor by targeting KIT receptors – A review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004;54 Suppl 1:S44-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0886-y.
Schnadig ID, Blanke CD. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Imatinib and beyond. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2006;7:427-37. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0018-5.
Bucher P, Villiger P, Egger JF, Buhler LH, Morel P. Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: From diagnosis to treatment. Swiss Med Wkly 2004;134:145-53. doi: 2004/11/smw-10530.
Corbin KS, Kindler HL, Liauw SL. Considering the role of radiation therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:713-8. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S36873.
Cuaron JJ, Goodman KA, Lee N, Wu AJ. External beam radiation therapy for locally advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Radiat Oncol 2013;8:274. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-274.
Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Collan J, Balk MH, Leyvraz S, Montemurro M. Radiotherapy for GIST progressing during or after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy: A prospective study. Radiother Oncol 2015;116:233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.025.
Nilsson B, Bümming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Odén A, Dortok A, Gustavsson B, et al.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era – A population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20862.
Tryggvason G, Gíslason HG, Magnússon MK, Jónasson JG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990-2003: The Icelandic GIST study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer 2005;117:289-93. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21167.
Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1466-78. doi: 10.1043/1543-2165.
Stiekema J, Kol S, Cats A, Yazdi AT, van Coevorden F, van Sandick JW. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors located in the stomach in the imatinib era. Am J Clin Oncol 2015;38:502-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182a78de9.
Liu H, Yan Z, Liao G, Yin H. Treatment strategy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Surg Oncol 2014;109:708-13. doi: 10.1002/jso.23562.
Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, Morgan JA, George S, Zahrieh D, et al.
Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2325-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3439.
Zanwar S, Ostwal V, Sahu A, Jain D, Ramaswamy A, Saklani A, et al.
Rectal GIST-outcomes and viewpoint from a tertiary cancer center. Indian J Gastroenterol 2016;35:445-9. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0710-8.
Dematteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Demetri GD, et al.
Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60500-6.
Jakob J, Mussi C, Ronellenfitsch U, Wardelmann E, Negri T, Gronchi A, et al.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: Results of surgical and multimodality therapy in the era of imatinib. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:586-92. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2647-1.
Wilkinson MJ, Fitzgerald JE, Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM, Messiou C, et al.
Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the rectum in the era of imatinib. Br J Surg 2015;102:965-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9818.
Wang YP, Li YI, Song C. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors outside the stomach. Oncol Lett 2015;10:2723-30. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3631.
Hohenberger P, Eisenberg B. Role of surgery combined with kinase inhibition in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Ann Surg Oncol 2009;17:2585-600. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1053-9.
Shen C, Chen H, Yin Y, Chen J, Zhang B, Chen Z, et al.
Preoperative imatinib for patients with primary unresectable or metastatic/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2014;69:758-62. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)09.
Bischof DA, Kim Y, Blazer DG 3rd
, Behman R, Karanicolas PJ, Law CH, et al.
Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An international multi-institutional analysis of 158 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.037.
Ogata K, Mochiki E, Ojima H, Haga N, Fukuchi M, Aihara R, et al.
Amulticenter long-term study of imatinib treatment for Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:942-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23773.
Eisenberg BL, Harris J, Blanke CD, Demetri GD, Heinrich MC, Watson JC, et al.
Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Early results of RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665. J Surg Oncol 2009;99:42-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21160.
Fiore M, Palassini E, Fumagalli E, Pilotti S, Tamborini E, Stacchiotti S, et al.
Preoperative imatinib mesylate for unresectable or locally advanced primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:739-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.11.005.
Gronchi A, Fiore M, Miselli F, Lagonigro MS, Coco P, Messina A, et al.
Surgery of residual disease following molecular-targeted therapy with imatinib mesylate in advanced/metastatic GIST. Ann Surg 2007;245:341-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000242710.36384.1b.
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Casper ES,et al
. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014;12:853-62. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0080.
Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schütte J, et al.
Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer 2014;120:2325-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28669.
Arezzo A, Verra M, Morino M. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal GIST. Dig Liver Dis 2011;43:923-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.06.012.
Gervaz P, Huber O, Bucher P, Sappino P, Morel P. Trans-sacral (Kraske) approach for gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the lower rectum: Old procedure for a new disease. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:951-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01489.x.
Hellan M, Maker VK. Transvaginal excision of a large rectal stromal tumor: An alternative. Am J Surg 2006;191:121-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.013.
DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000;231:51-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200001000-00008.
Gouveia AM, Pimenta AP, Capelinha AF, de la Cruz D, Silva P, Lopes JM. Surgical margin status and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Surg 2008;32:2375-82. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9704-8.
Casali PG, Jost L, Reichardt P, Schlemmer M, Blay JY; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009;20 Suppl 4:64-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp131.
Kyo K, Azuma M, Okamoto K, Nishiyama M, Shimamura T, Maema A, et al.
Neoadjuvant imatinib treatment and laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for a large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:68. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0837-1.
Di Scioscio V, Greco L, Pallotti MC, Pantaleo MA, Maleddu A, Nannini M, et al.
Three cases of bone metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Rare Tumors 2011;3:e17. doi: 10.4081/rt.2011.e17.
Tezcan Y, Koç M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum with bone and liver metastasis: A case study. Med Oncol 2011;28 Suppl 1:S204-6. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9697-7.
Ordog T, Zörnig M, Hayashi Y. Targeting disease persistence in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Stem Cells Transl Med 2015;4:702-7. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0298.
Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, Couture J, O'Sullivan B, Kandel R, et al.
Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: A review of 50 cases from a prospective database. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:50-9. doi: 10.1007/s10434-001-0050-4.
Ciresa M, D'Angelillo RM, Ramella S, Cellini F, Gaudino D, Stimato G, et al.
Molecularly targeted therapy and radiotherapy in the management of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum: A case report. Tumori 2009;95:236-9.
Gatto L, Nannini M, Saponara M, Di Scioscio V, Beltramo G, Frezza GP, et al.
Radiotherapy in the management of gist: State of the art and new potential scenarios. Clin Sarcoma Res 2017;7:1. doi: 10.1186/s13569-016-0065-z.
Pollock J, Morgan D, Denobile J, Williams J. Adjuvant radiotherapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum. Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:268-72.
Knowlton CA, Brady LW, Heintzelman RC. Radiotherapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Rare Tumors 2011;3:e35. doi: 10.4081/rt.2011.e35.
Lolli C, Pantaleo MA, Nannini M, Saponara M, Pallotti MC, Scioscio VD, et al.
Successful radiotherapy for local control of progressively increasing metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Rare Tumors 2011;3:e49. doi: 10.4081/rt.2011.e49.
Taremi M, Ringash J, Dawson LA. Upper abdominal malignancies: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 2007;40:272-88. doi: 10.1159/0000106041.
Ruiz AR Jr., Nassar AJ, Fromm H. Multiple malignant gastric stromal tumors presenting with GI bleeding: A case report and a review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:225-8. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70427-5.
Agaimy A, Wünsch PH. Lymph node metastasis in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) occurs preferentially in young patients < or = 40 years: An overview based on our case material and the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009;394:375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0449-5.
Bucher P, Egger JF, Gervaz P, Ris F, Weintraub D, Villiger P, et al.
An audit of surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.11.021.
Canda AE, Ozsoy Y, Nalbant OA, Sagol O. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach with lymph node metastasis. World J Surg Oncol 2008;6:97. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-97.
Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, Debiec-Rychter M, Wozniak A, Limon J, et al.
Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2018-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9377-9.
Sato T, Kanda T, Nishikura K, Hirota S, Hashimoto K, Nahagawa S, et al.
Two cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach with lymph node metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:1057-60.
Tashiro T, Hasegawa T, Omatsu M, Sekine S, Shimoda T, Katai H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the stomach showing lymph node metastases. Histopathology 2005;47:438-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02133.x.
Tryggvason G, Kristmundsson T, Orvar K, Jónasson JG, Magnússon MK, Gíslason HG. Clinical study on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in Iceland, 1990-2003. Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:2249-53. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9248-4.
Aparicio T, Boige V, Sabourin JC, Crenn P, Ducreux M, Le Cesne A, et al.
Prognostic factors after surgery of primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:1098-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.06.016.
Vassos N, Agaimy A, Hohenberger W, Croner RS. Extraabdominal lymph node metastasis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1232-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1464-3.
Gong N, Wong CS, Chu YC. Is lymph node metastasis a common feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumor? PET/CT correlation. Clin Nucl Med 2011;36:678-82. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318219ad31.
Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Yamamoto N, Yamaguchi T. Incidence and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis on c-Kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:1224-8. doi: 10.5754/hge10018.
Somu K, Dashore AR, Shah AR, Anandh R. Laparoscopic excision of large lower rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): A case report. J Minim Access Surg 2016;12:283-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181311.
Hamada M, Ozaki K, Horimi T, Tsuji A, Nasu Y, Iwata J, et al.
Recurrent rectal GIST resected successfully after preoperative chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate. Int J Clin Oncol 2008;13:355-60. doi: 10.1007/s10147-007-0735-1.
Tazawa H, Hirata Y, Kuga Y, Nishida T, Sakimoto H. Sphincter-saving resection by cluneal arched skin incision for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the lower rectum: A case report. Surg Case Rep 2017;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40792-016-0285-8.
Carlson J, Alobuia W, Mizell J. Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with metastasis to the penis: Case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016;29:172-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.006.
Terada T. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the digestive organs: A histopathologic study of 31 cases in a single Japanese institute. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2009;3:162-8.
Kapoor R, Khosla D, Kumar P, Kumar N, Bera A. Five-year follow up of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Recurrence-free survival by risk group. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2013;9:40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01494.x.
Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, Ueno M. Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery (intersphincteric resection) after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1769-7.
Farid M, Lee MJ, Chew MH, Ong WS, Sairi AN, Foo KF, et al.
Localized gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: An uncommon primary site with prominent disease and treatment-related morbidities. Mol Clin Oncol 2013;1:190-4. doi: 10.3892/mco.2012.25.
Pai VD, Demenezes JL, Patil PS, Saklani AP. Multimodality therapy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of imatinib-an Indian series. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016;7:262-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.088.
Choudhury A, Zhao H, Jalali F, Al Rashid S, Ran J, Supiot S, et al.
Targeting homologous recombination using imatinib results in enhanced tumor cell chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:203-13. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0959.
Yuasa T, Kitsukawa S, Sukegawa G, Yamamoto S, Kudo K, Miyazawa K, et al.
Early onset recall pneumonitis during targeted therapy with sunitinib. BMC Cancer 2013;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-3.
Hui EP, Ma BB, King AD, Mo F, Chan SL, Kam MK, et al.
Hemorrhagic complications in a phase II study of sunitinib in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma who has previously received high-dose radiation. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1280-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq629.
Tong CC, Ko EC, Sung MW, Cesaretti JA, Stock RG, Packer SH, et al.
Phase II trial of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy for oligometastases. PLoS One 2012;7:e36979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036979.
Kao J, Packer S, Vu HL, Schwartz ME, Sung MW, Stock RG, et al.
Phase 1 study of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy followed by maintenance sunitinib for patients with oligometastases: Acute toxicity and preliminary response. Cancer 2009;115:3571-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24412.
Chen SW, Lin LC, Kuo YC, Liang JA, Kuo CC, Chiou JF. Phase 2 study of combined sorafenib and radiation therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.017.