Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
5 years IF: 1.036 (® Thomson Reuters)
IF 2016: 1.064 (® Thomson Reuters)
Total Cites: 7140
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 4561
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 130  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1074-1078

Association between Serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D Concentration and TaqI Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism among Jordanian Females with Breast Cancer


Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health, Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan

Date of Submission28-Feb-2017
Date of Web Publication21-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Manar Fayiz Atoum
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115
Jordan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.204933

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among females. Genetic polymorphisms might have a role in carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine whether C to T base substitution within TaqI Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene (rs731236) in exon 9 was a risk factor among patients with breast cancer.
Methods: Peripheral blood was drawn from 122 Jordanian breast cancer patients and 100 healthy Jordanian volunteers in Al-Basheer Hospital during the summer months (from June to November of 2013, 2014, and 2015). DNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by TaqI restriction enzyme digestion. Quantification of serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D (25[OH]D) level was determined by competitive immunoassay Elecsys.
Results: Genotypic frequencies for TaqI TT, Tt, and tt genotypes were 41%, 46%, and 13% for breast cancer compared to 42%, 50%, and 8% for control, respectively. Vitamin D serum level was significantly lower in the breast cancer patients (8.1 ± 0.3 ng/ml) compared to the control group (21.2 ± 0.6 ng/ml; P= 0.001). This study showed an inverse association between 25(OH)D serum level and breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR], 22.72, 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.06–51.29).
Conclusions: An inverse association was found between 25(OH)D serum level and breast cancer risk. Statistical difference was also found between different VDR TaqI genotypes and circulating levels of 25(OH)D among Jordanian females with breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast Cancer; Genotypes; TaqI; Vitamin D Receptor


How to cite this article:
Atoum MF, Al-Khatib YM. Association between Serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D Concentration and TaqI Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism among Jordanian Females with Breast Cancer. Chin Med J 2017;130:1074-8

How to cite this URL:
Atoum MF, Al-Khatib YM. Association between Serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D Concentration and TaqI Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism among Jordanian Females with Breast Cancer. Chin Med J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 26];130:1074-8. Available from: http://www.cmj.org/text.asp?2017/130/9/1074/204933


  Introduction Top


Nowadays, cancer turns out to be one of the most widespreading diseases. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among females, as well as the second leading cause of cancer mortality among women. In 2017, an estimated 255,180 new cases of invasive breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in women in the U.S., along with 63,410 new cases of noninvasive (in situ) breast cancer.[1] In Jordan, breast cancer is the most common malignancy that affects women, accounting for 36.7% of all female cancers and it is the leading cause of cancer deaths among Jordanian women.[2] Risk factors associated with breast cancer include age, family history of breast cancer, ethnicity, weight, using hormone replacement therapy, and low Vitamin D intake.

Vitamin D regulates the growth and differentiation of various cell types, including the cancer cells. Vitamin D has also regulatory effects on cell death, tumor invasion, and angiogenesis.[3] Vitamin D hormone also has an important role in many metabolic pathways, including those involved in the immune responses. The actions of Vitamin D are mediated by the nuclear Vitamin D receptor (VDR), in which nearly every cell type in our bodies has receptors for Vitamin D. VDR is expressed in the normal mammary gland and plays a significant role in the development and function of the mammary gland.[4] VDR gene is located on chromosome 12cen-ql2, it contains 14 exons and spans approximately 75 kb of genomic DNA.[5]

Epidemiological studies demonstrated that decreased sunlight exposure, and diminished Vitamin D production by the skin, is correlated with higher breast cancer incidence and mortality.[6],[7] Vitamin D status and the practice of moderate physical activity were considered protective factors for breast cancer.[8] Vitamin D supplementation, mostly taken daily and combined with calcium, was associated with a decreased postmenopausal breast cancer risk in menopausal hormone therapy users.[9] Experimental and clinical observations suggest that Vitamin D and its analogs might be effective in preventing the malignant transformation and/or the progression of various types of human tumors including breast cancer.[10] In addition, an association between low 25-hydroxy Vitamin D 25(OH)D levels and increased risk of triple-negative breast cancer was found [11] in Saudi Arabia, in which patients with 25(OH)D levels ≤25 nmol/L were 2.54 times more likely to present with triple-negative status compared to those with 25(OH)D levels >25 nmol/L.

VDR polymorphisms were associated with different cancers, and VDR polymorphisms might influence both breast cancer risk and prognosis. However, the associations between VDR gene polymorphisms and cancer risk showed controversial results according to the gene polymorphism, the race of patients, and cancer stage.[12] VDR gene has multiple gene polymorphisms in exon 2 and 3’UTR region; VDR-FokI (rs2228570), VDR-BsmI (rs1544410), VDR-TaqI (rs731236), and VDR-ApaI (rs7975232). These polymorphisms alter the polyadenylation of the VDR mRNA transcript and thus affect mRNA stability.[13] Previous studies showed no relationship between the breast cancer risk and TaqI gene polymorphism, while other studies showed a strong association between TaqI polymorphism, breast risk, and metastatic stage.[14],[15] Up to our knowledge, gene polymorphism within VDR among Jordanian breast cancer females and its relation with Vitamin D activity had been never studied previously. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine serum 25(OH)D level among Jordanian breast cancer females and to examine any association between VDR TaqI gene polymorphism, Vitamin D level, and breast cancer risk.


  Methods Top


Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (No: 14076) at the Hashemite University, and consent forms were signed by all participants before patients and control interviewing and sample collection.

One hundred and twenty-two breast cancer females were recruited from breast clinic at Al-Basheer Hospital, Amman, Jordan, during the summer time (from June to November of 2013, 2014, and 2015). Females were diagnosed by a specialized pathologist using tumor grading and staging system.[16] Blood samples were drawn at the time of diagnosis before surgery and before any chemotherapy treatment.

Age-matched, cancer-free female control volunteers, with no family history of any cancer (n = 100), were recruited as a control. Blood samples were collected (in the summer time from June to November of 2013, 2014, and 2015) from participants into two tubes; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube and plain tube. DNA was extracted from EDTA tubes and stored at 4°C. Serum was separated from plain tubes, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and frozen at −60°C for Vitamin D determination.

DNA samples were amplified using a thermal cycler (BIO RAD iCycler, USA) by adding forward (5'-CAGAGCATGGACAGGGAGCAA-3') and reverse (5'-CACTTCGAGCACAAGGGGCGTTAGC-3') primers. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification reaction was carried out in 50 μl reaction volumes using Go Taq Green Master Mix and according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, USA). DNA samples were amplified using programmed PCR protocol: Initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 45 s; 58°C for 60 s; and 72°C for 90 s, and then a reaction was carried out at 73°C for 5 min. Amplification products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide; the amplified products were 501 bp fragment that contains the variant site. Small nuclear polymorphism TaqI in VDR gene was detected by restriction enzyme digestion using TaqI endonuclease digestion (New England Biolabs, USA). Digestion products were visualized under 2% agarose gel. The size of Taq1 (TT) genotype was 494 bp, Taq1 (Tt) genotype was 494 bp, 290bp, and 204bp and for Taq1 (tt) genotype was 290 bp and 204 bp.

The serum level of 25(OH)D was determined according to Vitamin D Standardization Program [17] and the manufacturer's instructions by electrochemiluminescence method using Elecsys assay kit (Roche Diagnostics, France) for Beckman Coulter-Access/Access 2 Immunoassay System. The serum levels of 25(OH)D were classified into deficient (25[OH]D level ≤10.0 ng/ml), insufficient (25[OH]D level between 10 and 20 ng/ml), or optimal (25[OH]D level more than 20 ng/ml).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 17.0 and 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test was used to evaluate case-control differences for TaqI genotype distribution among test and control groups. A t-test was used to assess the significance of difference of mean 25(OH)D levels between test and control groups. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.


  Results Top


[Table 1] shows that more than half of the breast cancer females (55.7%) were between 50 and 59 years old. Fifty-two and a half of them were in the menopausal stage and 49.2% were overweight. More than 60% of the breast cancer females had a unilateral tumor at the left side [Table 2] and more than 62% of them had Grade III.
Table 1: Age, menopausal, mammography testing, and BMI among breast cancer and healthy control groups, n (%)

Click here to view
Table 2: Neoplasm characteristics of Jordanian females with breast cancer, n (%)

Click here to view


According to the hormonal receptor status, 62.3% of the examined breast cancer females were estrogen receptor alpha positive, fifty-two and a half of them were progesterone receptor positive, and 36.1% of them were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive [Table 2].

VDR genotypic and allelic frequencies among breast cancer and control participants are shown in [Table 3]. The genotypes are in Hardy-Weinberg equation. There was no significant association of the VDR gene Taq1 polymorphism with breast cancer risk among patients or healthy controls (P = 0.460). The frequency of TT, Tt, and tt genotypes was 41%, 46%, and 13%, respectively, for breast cancer patients compared with 42%, 50%, and 8%, respectively, for controls [Table 3].
Table 3: Association of VDR genotypic and allelic frequencies among breast cancer patients and controls with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

Click here to view


The results of this study showed that the mean serum level of 25(OH)D for breast cancer patients (8.1 ± 0.3 ng/ml) was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.2 ± 0.6 ng/ml) (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9–13.2, P = 0.001) [Table 4]. Breast cancer patients deficient for 25(OH)D (with <10.0 ng/ml) had 22.7-fold increased breast cancer risk [Table 5].
Table 4: Mean serum levels of 25(OH)D in breast cancer patients and controls

Click here to view
Table 5: Association between 25(OH)D levels and breast cancer risk

Click here to view


The study showed that there was statistically significant difference in the mean 25(OH)D levels among TT, Tt, and tt genotypes within both breast cancer patients (P = 0.009) and control group (P = 0.027) [Table 6]. TT, Tt, and tt genotypes had mean 25(OH)D level of 7.0 ± 3.5, 8.7 ± 3.0, and 9.7 ± 4.8 for breast cancer patients and 19.4 ± 5.7, 22.1 ± 6.3, and 25.0 ± 8.4 for controls, respectively.
Table 6: Mean serum levels of 25(OH)D for each TaqI genotype

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Breast cancer is the most common malignant affliction among women and the first cause of cancer deaths in women aged 15–54 years worldwide.[18] The origin of breast neoplasm is multifactorial; however, some factors may increase the risk of breast cancer including the age, family history, diet, presence of benign mammary disease, environment, and genetic factors related to Vitamin D level and VDR polymorphisms.[19] Vitamin D deficiency has become a major concern after the discovery of the monumental amplitude of populations blighted with it and its varied health consequences. Reports showed that most world's population are not getting sufficient amount of Vitamin D due to the current lifestyle and environmental factors that limit sunlight exposure.[20] Breast cancer research in the Middle East is extremely limited and genetics studies about cancer within Jordan are scarce except for few studies that screen gene polymorphism.[21],[22],[23],[24]

To the best of our knowledge, this is a very rare study that showed the association between VDR TaqI genotypes or allelic frequencies among breast cancer patients and controls. This study showed no significant association between VDR TaqI genotypes or allelic frequencies among breast cancer patients and controls. Similar results were reported by Hou et al. and Yang et al.[25],[26] among both population in Taiwan (China) and Caucasian breast cancer women. The same results were also reported by the meta-analysis from pooling 39 studies that showed no significant associations between VDR TaqI polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.[27]

This study showed that most breast cancer participants were Vitamin D deficient (66.4%) and this result is consistent with the previous study that is carried out by Mallah et al.[28] By making revisions as followed in line with the results of this study, we found a significant difference in Vitamin D serum level between breast cancer females and controls, in which breast cancer patients had remarkably lower levels despite the sufficient sun exposure supplied by Amman-Jordan's latitude 31°59'N as described by Weinstock and Moses.[29] Vitamin D deficiency might be attributed to other contributing factors including darker skin tone of the Middle Eastern population, use of sun blocks as well as avoiding performing activity in sunny areas and the dietary regimen. Two pathways for Vitamin D biosynthesis and action have been proposed in mammary carcinogenesis. The first one involves 1,25(OH)2D and the second involves 25(OH)D. In the first circulating pathway, 1,25(OH)2D reaches the breast tissue to exert its anticarcinogenic effect. While in the other pathway, circulating 25(OH)D reaches the breast tissue and is catalyzed to 1,25(OH)2D by the 1-α-hydroxylase in the breasts. All produced 1,25(OH)2D might bind to VDR and therefore regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.

Data of the present study showed a low frequency of patients with tt genotypes among breast cancer while a study performed by Mishra et al.[13] showed no association between VDR TaqI genotypes and disease outcome. Moreover, this study showed a significant difference between Vitamin D level among different genotypes and within breast cancer patients and control groups [Table 4], in which the rare genotype (tt) had the highest Vitamin D level compared to the other patterns, followed by the heterozygous genotype (Tt). Meanwhile, the wild-type genotype (TT) scored the lowest Vitamin D level which is compatible with results that were found by Janowsky et al.[30] One of the limitations of this study is the limited number of patients enrolled in this study. Hence, further large studies, particularly referring to larger sample size, more gene polymorphisms, and gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, are recommended.

In conclusion, this study found that circulating level of 25(OH)D was significantly lower among breast cancer patients indicating an inverse relationship between 25(OH)D level and breast cancer risk. Furthermore, a significant association between different TaqI genotypes and circulating levels of 25(OH)D was found.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by Graduate studies support for Medical Laboratory students from the Hashemite University (No: 03-2013).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Available from: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 07].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Atoum MF, Tanashat RQ, Mahmoud SA. Negative association of the HLA-DQB1*02 allele with breast cancer development among Jordanians. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:7007-10. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.11.7007.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Nair R, Maseeh A. Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2012;3:118-26. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.95506.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Beaudin SG, Robilotto S, Welsh J. Comparative regulation of gene expression by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in cells derived from normal mammary tissue and breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2015;148:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.09.014.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Crofts LA, Hancock MS, Morrison NA, Eisman JA. Multiple promoters direct the tissue-specific expression of novel N-terminal variant human Vitamin D receptor gene transcripts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:10529-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10529.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Guo B, Jiang X, Hu X, Li F, Chen X. Association between Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and breast cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:8020-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Moukayed M, Grant WB. The roles of UVB and Vitamin D in reducing risk of cancer incidence and mortality: A review of the epidemiology, clinical trials, and mechanisms. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2017;1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11154-017-9415-2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Oliveira Sediyama CM, Dias MM, Pessoa MC, Queiroz AR, Suhett LG, Freitas RN, et al. Lifestyle and Vitamin D dosage in women with breast cancer. Nutr Hosp 2016;33:584. doi: 10.20960/nh.584.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Cadeau C, Fournier A, Mesrine S, Clavel-Chapelon F, Fagherazzi G, Boutron-Ruault MC. Interaction between current Vitamin D supplementation and menopausal hormone therapy use on breast cancer risk: Evidence from the E3N cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;102:966-73. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.104323.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Grant WB. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and colorectal adenomas: Case-control versus nested case-control studies. Anticancer Res 2015;35:1153-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Abulkhair O, Saadeddin A, Makram O, Gasmelseed A, Pasha T, Shehata H, et al. Vitamin D levels and breast cancer characteristics: Findings in patients from Saudi Arabia. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2016;164:106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.11.003.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wang LY, Zhang P, Wang HF, Qin ZW, Wei KB, Lv XA. Association of Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with end-stage renal disease and the development of high-turnover renal osteodystrophy in a Chinese population. Genet Mol Res 2016;15;1-8. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15026825.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mishra DK, Wu Y, Sarkissyan M, Sarkissyan S, Chen Z, Shang X, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and prognosis of breast cancer among African-American and Hispanic women. PLoS One 2013;8:e57967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057967.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
McKay JD, McCullough ML, Ziegler RG, Kraft P, Saltzman BS, Riboli E, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: Results from the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:297-305. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0539.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Abd-Elsalam EA, Ismaeil NA, Abd-Alsalam HS. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal Egyptian women. Tumour Biol 2015;36:6425-31. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3332-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Cowherd SM. Tumor staging and grading: A primer. Methods Mol Biol 2012;823:1-18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-216-2_1.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Sempos CT, Vesper HW, Phinney KW, Thienpont LM, Coates PM; Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP). Vitamin D status as an international issue: National surveys and the problem of standardization. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2012;243:32-40. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2012.681935.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Available from: http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/breast cancer facts. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 07].  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Colagar AH, Firouzjah HM, Halalkhor S. Vitamin D receptor poly(A) microsatellite polymorphism and 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels: Association with susceptibility to breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 2015;18:119-25. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.2.119.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Azarpeykan S, Dittmer KE, Gee EK, Marshall JC, Wallace J, Elder P, et al. Influence of blanketing and season on Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium concentrations in horses in New Zealand. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2016;56:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.03.003.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Atoum MF, Tchoporyan MN. Association between circulating Vitamin D, the Taq1 Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk among Jordanians. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:7337-41. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.17.7337.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Atoum MF, AlKateeb D, AlHaj Mahmoud SA. The Fok1 Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and 25(OH)D serum levels and prostate cancer among Jordanian men. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:2227-30. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.6.2227.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Atoum MF. ACC interleukin-10 gene promoter haplotype as a breast cancer risk factor predictor among Jordanian females. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:3353-7. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S101628.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Atoum MF, Alzoughool F. Reduction in breast cancer susceptibility due to XbaI gene polymorphism of alpha estrogen receptor gene in Jordanians. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2017;9:45-9. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S125652.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hou MF, Tien YC, Lin GT, Chen CJ, Liu CS, Lin SY, et al. Association of Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with sporadic breast cancer in Taiwanese patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;74:1-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1016048900049.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Yang B, Liu S, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhao X, Zheng D, et al. Current evidence on the four polymorphisms of VDR and breast cancer risk in Caucasian women. Meta Gene 2013;2:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2013.09.008.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Zhang K, Song L. Association between Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 39 studies. PLoS One 2014;9:e96125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096125.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Mallah EM, Hamad MF, Elmanaseer MA, Qinna NA, Idkaidek NM, Arafat TA, et al. Plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D among Jordanians: Effect of biological and habitual factors on Vitamin D status. BMC Clin Pathol 2011;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-11-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Weinstock MA, Moses AM. Skin cancer meets Vitamin D: The way forward for dermatology and public health. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:720-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.016.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Janowsky EC, Lester GE, Weinberg CR, Millikan RC, Schildkraut JM, Garrett PA, et al. Association between low levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk. Public Health Nutr 1999;2:283-91.  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed225    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded93    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal




京ICP备05052599号