Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
5 years IF: 1.036 (® Thomson Reuters)
IF 2016: 1.064 (® Thomson Reuters)
Total Cites: 7140
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 2629
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 130  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 737-740

Screening for Differentially Expressed Genes of Gastric Stromal Tumor Originating from Muscularis Propria


1 Department of Clinical Medicine, Queen Mary School of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, China

Date of Submission24-Dec-2016
Date of Web Publication6-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
Liu-Ye Huang
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.201614

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Gene Expression; Gastric Stromal Tumor; Microarray Analysis; Muscularis Propria


How to cite this article:
Huang J, Zhang B, Huang LY. Screening for Differentially Expressed Genes of Gastric Stromal Tumor Originating from Muscularis Propria. Chin Med J 2017;130:737-40

How to cite this URL:
Huang J, Zhang B, Huang LY. Screening for Differentially Expressed Genes of Gastric Stromal Tumor Originating from Muscularis Propria. Chin Med J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 20];130:737-40. Available from: http://www.cmj.org/text.asp?2017/130/6/737/201614


  Introduction Top


Gastric stromal tumor (GST) is a set of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors those originate from interstitial cells of Cajal. Its early diagnosis and treatment are critical to prognosis.[1] The occurrence of GST remains obscure; this study used Affymetrix expression spectrum chip to detect the gene expression spectrum of GST and explore new molecular target that is used in the treatment and prognosis of GST.


  Methods Top


Selection of clinical samples

Six patients with GST (two males and four females, aged 41–71 years, with average age of 60 years) were enrolled in this study. The size of GST ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 cm, with average size of 3.8 cm. Four cases had mitotic index <5/50 high power field (HPF) and two cases had mitotic index <10/50 HPF. Tissue samples of GST that were treated with endoscope and laparoscope as well as its surrounding tissues were collected, three samples for each group. The tumor tissue and corresponding surrounding tissue in each sample were extracted. The Research Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University approved this study (No. (2016)172). Informed consents were obtained from all the enrolled patients.

Test materials and reagent

Equipment and reagent of Eukaryotic Poly-A RNA Control Kit (Affymetrix Company, USA); MessageAmp Premier RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion Company, USA); Eukaryotic Hybridization Control Kit (Affymetrix Company, USA); Hybridization, Wash, and Stain Kit (Affymetrix Company, USA); PCR Biometra (MJ Company, USA); and Gene Chip ® Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix Company, USA) were used.

Total RNA extraction and probe preparation

This test was performed in CapitalBio Technology Co., Ltd. (Tsinghua University, China). Trizol total RNA extraction kit was used to extract and purify total RNA. We started from the total RNA of GST and surrounding tissues and synthesized the first chain of complementary DNA (cDNA) through reverse transcription using T7 Oligo (dT) primer that contains T7 promoter sequence as primer. Then, the first chain of cDNA was used as template to synthesize the second chain of cDNA. The second chain of cDNA was used as template to use T7 enzyme mix to synthesize cRNA through in vitro transcription and by adding biotin labeling. cRNA was purified with magnetic bead and cRNA was quantified and segmented into size suitable for hybridization.

Chip hybridization, clean-up, and staining

Segmented cRNA was prepared into hybridization reaction system to initially prehybridize the chip for 10 min. Then, the chip was put into the hybridization oven in a balanced manner and was hybridized for 16 h cyclically with hybridization solution that is from Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array expression profile chip (Affymetrix Company, USA). After this, the chip was injected cleaning and staining fluids for cleaning and staining.

Scanning, data extraction, and bio-information analysis of chip

The fluorescence ship scanner (Gene Chip ® Scanner 3000) from Affymetrix Company was used to scan chip. Data preprocessing was done with robust multi-array average algorithm, and the data were performed to analyze differentially expressed gene using the R pack of significance analysis of microarray. According to criteria for selecting differential gene (q ≤ 5% and fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5), it was judged as differentially expressed gene of GST and surrounding tissues. Finally, PANTHER/KEGG (Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Kyoto University, Japan) database and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis software were used to analyze these differentially expressed genes bioinformatically to find the molecular functions and biological pathways involved by these differentially expressed genes.


  Results Top


Total RNA extraction analysis

The six pairs of tissue samples were detected with spectrophotometer; their A260/A280 ratios were at the range from 1.8 to 2.0. Agarose gel electrophoresis found two clear 28s/18s ribosomal RNA bands, indicating that the total RNA purity and integrity were high and met experimental requirements.

Analysis of differentially expressed gene

According to differential gene selection criteria: q ≤ 5% and fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5, the six pairs of samples totally had 3293 common differentially expressed genes, including 2588 genes upregulated and 705 downregulated. Part of the differentially expressed genes is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Top ten genes with significant differential expression of GST and its surrounding tissues

Click here to view


Pathway and Gene Ontology analysis for common differentially expressed genes of gastric stromal tumor and its surrounding tissue

By analyzing common differentially expressed genes with PANTHER software, it was found that two groups of differentially express genes and three pathways were involved, including cadherin signal pathway, Wnt signal pathway, and angiogenesis.[2]

By searching KEGG database, it was found that 13 pathways were involved, including carbon metabolism and cancers, Rap1 signal pathway, extracellular matrix receptor interaction, phosphatidylinositol signal system, Ras signal pathway, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (P13K)-AKT signal pathway, cell adhesion molecules, and several pathways closely associated with development of tumors.[3]

By searching and analyzing the biological process, cell composition, and molecular function of differentially expressed genes using GO function analysis software, it was found that a significant number of differentially expressed genes had relationship with extracellular matrix and basement membrane in the aspect of cell composition. Most differentially expressed genes were combined with calcium ion, growth factor, and metal and were related to transmembrane receptor protein kinase's activity, cell adhesion molecules, and nucleic acid kinase in the aspect of molecular function. From the perspective of biological process, many genes had participated in the various biological processes associated with tumor, such as cell differentiation, cell or intercellular adhesion, calcium ion transmembrane activity regulation, cell proliferation regulation, cell migration regulation, metabolism process of guanosine triphosphate and diphosphate nucleic acid, and associated signal transmission, and electrically coupled cell communication.


  Discussion Top


In this study, Affymetrix messenger RNA expression spectrum chip was used to compare the gene expression spectrum difference between GST tissue and its corresponding surrounding tissue, and the results showed 3293 common differentially expressed genes between the two groups, including 2588 upregulated and 705 downregulated. Among the upregulated differentially expressed genes, the upregulation of DPP10 was most significant, with fold change value up to 244.4. DPP10 gene is a member of the serine endopeptidase family. DPP10 can gate-control potassium ion pathway by regulating voltage to vary conformation, affecting cell proliferation and differentiation, cell cycle progression, and cell apoptosis. A previous study showed that DPP10 gene is differently expressed in various tissues and organs and is related to the genesis of a variety of diseases and tumors;[4] we presume that DPP10 that was obviously upregulated in this study might participate in the genesis and development of GST through certain mechanism, for which the details are pending for further studies.

Both KIT and PDGFRA genes were found as upregulated expressions in this study. As the gain-of-function mutation of KIT and PDGFRA has been proved in study, they can be treated as the two leading genesis mechanisms for most GSTs for the relation of their overexpression or mutation to the genesis and development of GST. Furthermore, imatinib, as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for c-KIT or PDGFRA, is extensively used in treating GST.[5] We also found in this study that the expression of ETV1 gene, a member of the ETS family, is obviously upregulated. Each ETS family member has a highly conservative DNA-binding domain (ETS domain) that regulates gene transcription, adjusts cell proliferation and differentiation, and participates in the genesis and development of a variety of tumors. In our study, we found that the over expression of DKK4 might promote the proliferation of tumor cells with unclear mechanism and that there is over expression in genes related to cell adhesion, such as FAT3, PCDH family (including PCDHAI, PCDHB16, and PCDH14), CDH11, and DCHS1, and they participate in the adhesion, migration, differentiation, and signal transmission of cells by adjusting the intercellular interaction and interaction between cell and extracellular matrix; they might also be relevant to the progression of GST. In addition, our test also detected clear upregulation of genes related to cell growth and differentiation, such as JAK3, BAX, FGFR1, and ETV5, which can promote abnormal proliferation and differentiation of cells. Their over expression might be a promoting factor for the development of GST. This study found that downregulated gene expression was mainly reflected in functions such as tumor inhibition, intercellular signal transmission, stress, and immune defense.

In addition, by searching PANTHER database, it can be found that these differentially expressed genes are involving a number of signal transmission pathways related to the genesis and development of tumors, such as Wnt signal pathway and angiogenesis, which is correlated with tumor angiogenesis. ETV played such a role.[6] Furthermore, the result of KEGG pathway analysis showed that genes in GST differentially expressed are involved in pathways related to carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and cell adhesion have differential gene expression, indicating that involved substance metabolism and intercellular adhesion can promote cell growth and eventually tumor genesis; for those pathways that are closely related to tumor genesis, such as Rap1 signal pathway, sulfur ester acyl inositol signal system, Ras signal pathway, and P13K-ART signal pathway, the involved genes are also expressed differentially, suggesting that the genesis of GST has activated a number of tumor-related pathways that regulate the genesis and development of GST. However, exact tumorigenesis mechanisms and their interactions are still required in further studies and verification.

This study showed that there were significant differentially expressed genes in GST and its surrounding tissues. If further studies can be performed to explore these differentially expressed genes in GST and their exact tumorigenesis mechanism and the interactions to find new molecular biomarkers for GST diagnosis and prognosis, new insights of GST diagnosis and treatment can be made.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by a grant of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81470909).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Wu CR, Huang LY, Guo J, Zhang B, Cui J, Sun CM, et al. Clinical control study of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric tumors arising from the muscularis propria. Chin Med J 2015;128:1455-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.157651.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Jang BG, Lee HE, Kim WH. ETV1 mRNA is specifically expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Virchows Arch 2015;467:393-403. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1813-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Tong HX, Zhou YH, Hou YY, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Xie B, et al. Expression profile of microRNAs in gastrointestinal stromal tumors revealed by high throughput quantitative RT-PCR microarray. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:5843-55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5843.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Cotterchio M, Lowcock E, Bider-Canfield Z, Lemire M, Greenwood C, Gallinger S, et al. Association between variants in atopy-related immunologic candidate genes and pancreatic cancer risk. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125273.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Zhang H, Zhang SL, Xu HM. Coexistence of a c-kit negative gastrointestinal stromal tumor and a gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma. Chin Med J 2010;123:3728-30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.24.040.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Morita R, Suzuki M, Kasahara H, Shimizu N, Shichita T, Sekiya T, et al. ETS transcription factor ETV2 directly converts human fibroblasts into functional endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:160-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413234112.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed176    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal




京ICP备05052599号